Disclosure: This comparison is published by Remote. To ensure a fair, commercially useful decision guide, factual capabilities are drawn directly from official vendor documentation, while experiential claims rely on verified third-party reviews. Rankings and recommendations are based on a transparent weighted rubric evaluating pricing clarity, procurement friction, operating model fit, and public proof.
Choosing an employer of record (EOR) provider is no longer a simple vendor selection; it is an infrastructure decision. The right partner must handle the irreducible complexity of global employment, from tax codes to payroll rules, while integrating flawlessly into the tools your business already runs on.
In this guide, we’ve evaluated two popular EOR providers: Velocity Global (now Pebl), and Remote. However, rather than comparing superficial country counts, we have compared operating models: quote-led, high-touch managed services versus an API-first, intelligent infrastructure built to act as the single authoritative system of record for your worldwide workforce.
Here are the differences — and which one is best for your company.
The TL;DR: Which platform is better for your team?
Here are the key findings:
Best overall: Remote. Remote is the better default choice for most buyers because it provides transparent public pricing, lower procurement friction, and a flexible, intelligent infrastructure that natively supports EOR, global payroll, and contractors worldwide.
Best for enterprise-scale service-led EOR: Velocity Global. With 24/7 support explicitly tied to its EOR pricing and a deeply consultative service posture, Velocity Global is a highly credible option for enterprises that prioritize managed services over software autonomy.
Best for pricing transparency: Remote. Remote publishes its flat-rate fees openly, allowing buyers to self-qualify and calculate total cost of ownership without a mandatory sales cycle.
Velocity Global provides a highly managed, quote-led service model designed for enterprise oversight. Remote provides an API-first, intelligent compliance infrastructure designed to give you the freedom to plug in your existing HR tools and build custom workflows with absolute legal confidence.
Quick chooser
Choose Remote if…
Choose Velocity Global (now Pebl) if…
You want a single authoritative system of record for global employment (covering EOR, payroll, and contractors) with highly transparent, publicly listed pricing.
You are an enterprise buyer who specifically wants a service-led, high-touch support model for navigating global expansion.
You are building for the future and need an API-first infrastructure that integrates natively with leading HRIS platforms like Workday, BambooHR, and Personio.
You want a standard published rate ($399/mo) plus potential custom add-ons for complex markets.
You want to reduce procurement friction via a mature Trust Center housing SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and SCIM documentation.
You prioritize a vendor that markets 185+ countries and wraps compliance, onboarding, and expense management into a bundled enterprise service package.
You value deep, owned, in-country infrastructure and local compliance experts over outsourced operational networks.
Your organization is willing to trade upfront software transparency for a heavily guided, consultative partnership model.
Quick comparison table
Remote
Velocity Global
Best for
Buyers who want transparent pricing, lower procurement friction, and an intelligent infrastructure for global employment.
Buyers who want enterprise-grade global reach, high-touch support, and a service-led EOR model.
Service category
Global employment infrastructure
Enterprise EOR and managed workforce services
EOR country coverage
Worldwide
185+ countries
Payroll model
Unified execution alongside EOR for direct entities.
Ask to see API depth and automated SCIM provisioning.
Verify the exact workflow for off-cycle payroll corrections.
Why this comparison is not just about country count or sticker price
If you evaluate EORs strictly by asking "Who covers more countries?", you are asking the wrong question. A claimed presence in 185+ countries is a marketing signal; it does not tell you how payroll is calculated, who assumes the legal liability, or how hard it will be to sync that data with your HRIS.
The real decision centers on your operational reality:
Price transparency vs quote-led enterprise motions: Transparent pricing allows finance teams to forecast reliably. Quote-led models require extensive discovery calls before you can secure budget approval.
Intelligent infrastructure vs managed service: Are you buying a foundation that your IT and HR teams can build upon via webhooks and APIs (Remote), or are you outsourcing the operation entirely to a managed service team (Velocity Global)?
Entity payroll vs EOR workflows: Managing payroll for your own established legal entities requires different tax engines and workflows than managing EOR employees.
It’s crucial to bear all of this in mind.
How to choose between Velocity Global (now Pebl) and Remote in 2026
To make a defensible procurement decision, you must map the vendor's capabilities to your internal stage and operating model.
Key definitions
Employer of record (EOR): The EOR provider acts as the legal employer on your behalf in countries where you have no local entity, and manages compliance, taxes, and payroll. What is an EOR and how does it work?
Contractor management: The tool(s) to onboard, compliantly classify, and pay independent freelancers worldwide.
It’s important to consider entity-vs-EOR workflows. For instance, if you already own legal entities in Germany and the UK, but need EOR services in Japan, you need a provider capable of handling both efficiently. Remote explicitly builds global payroll and EOR into a single compliance engine; Velocity Global markets global payroll, but its public documentation leans heavily toward EOR-led delivery.
Your company’s maturity stage is also key. Early-stage and hyper-growth companies require agility, transparent pricing, and API flexibility to scale. Enterprise companies often have complex legacy systems and may require highly customized, service-led orchestration to manage change.
Velocity Global vs Remote: A direct comparison
With all this in mind, let’s get into the weeds:
1. EOR coverage and legal-employer model
It is absolutely critical to understand who bears the ultimate legal responsibility for your global team.
Remote’s EOR covers the globe, operating on a foundation of deep, owned, in-country infrastructure. By employing in-house payroll teams and local employment law experts, Remote minimizes handoffs and retains strict control over compliance.
Velocity Global publicly advertises coverage in 185+ countries, emphasizing enterprise-grade global reach.
Balanced view: Both offer massive global footprints, but Remote’s infrastructure-first approach provides tighter control over the compliance stack. Velocity Global operates a mixed entity model, using owned legal entities in some countries and third-party partner entities in others. This is worth clarifying in any demo, as third-party handoffs can affect onboarding speed, compliance accountability, and indemnification terms. Remote, by contrast, operates exclusively through its own in-country entities.
What to verify in demo: "Who acts as the direct legal employer in our specific target countries, and what are the indemnification terms for local labor disputes?"
2. Payroll capabilities and payroll depth
Global payroll for your own entities requires precision, visibility, and seamless gross-to-net execution.
Remote lists Global Payroll publicly at $29 per employee/month. It serves as the single authoritative system of record, integrating entity-based payroll operations seamlessly with EOR workflows.
Velocity Global markets global payroll guidance across 185+ countries, though its public documentation centers more heavily on bundled EOR-led delivery rather than transparent, standalone payroll software pricing.
Balanced view: Remote provides far stronger public clarity on its payroll product boundaries and pricing.
What to verify in demo: "What is the exact Service Level Agreement (SLA) and workflow for processing an off-cycle payroll correction?"
3. Contractor support and contractor-to-employee pathways
Contractors require compliant classification and seamless international payout rails.
Remote publicly lists Contractor Management at $29 per active contractor/month, with advanced tiers for comprehensive compliance shielding (Contractor Management Plus at $99 per contractor/month, and Contractor of Record at $325 per contractor/month).
Velocity Global builds contractor workflows into its platform, and provides contractor help-center resources, though its public marketing heavily prioritizes EOR.
Balanced view: Remote has a much clearer, more aggressively priced public narrative for managing and converting contractors globally.
What to verify in demo: "Can you demonstrate the exact platform workflow for transitioning a contractor to a full-time EOR employee?"
4. Onboarding UX and implementation model
Fast onboarding relies on intuitive software; complex rollouts rely on expert orchestration.
Remote treats global employment as intelligent infrastructure. Because the platform is built to be composed, extended, and integrated, customers often experience a highly autonomous, self-serve onboarding flow (G2: Verified User in Manufacturing, 12/16/2025; Tom H., 2/17/2026; Verified User in Information Technology and Services, 5/13/2025: https://www.g2.com/products/remote/reviews).
Velocity Global emphasizes high-touch support and expert partnership, indicating a more heavily managed, service-led implementation.
Balanced view: Remote wins for teams wanting software leverage and fast self-service. Velocity Global is attractive for organizations that require close support through every step of a complex rollout.
What to verify in demo: "What is the average implementation timeline, and what specific tasks will my HR team be responsible for?"
5. Compliance posture, security, and public proof
Enterprise IT requires extensive documentation before authorizing HR software.
Both vendors are highly credible here. The Remote Trust Center publicly references SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and CSA STAR Level 1. Velocity Global’s trust center references SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, GDPR, and TX-RAMP.
Balanced view: Both pass enterprise security gates. Remote’s advantage lies in the broader maturity of its adjacent public documentation (like SCIM and API developer docs), which accelerates procurement.
What to verify in demo: Request full Data Processing Agreements (DPA) and audit log capabilities.
6. Integrations, reporting, and systems fit
A platform must slot into your existing stack without disruption.
This is a core differentiator for Remote. Remote is API-first, and natively connects with leading HRIS platforms like Workday, Personio, and BambooHR. It also openly publishes its API documentation and SCIM docs.
Velocity Global markets 250+ HR, payroll, and finance integrations (including BambooHR and Greenhouse).
Balanced view: While Velocity Global claims a high volume of connectors, Remote wins decisively on documented depth, its explicit "free integration" messaging, and its modern, API-driven infrastructure.
What to verify in demo: "Show us the live field mapping for our specific HRIS, and confirm if the integration is native or relies on a middleware connector."
7. Service model and support quality
You need reliable experts when local labor laws shift.
Velocity Global explicitly includes 24/7 support in its EOR pricing and leans heavily into an expert partnership model. Users generally praise the level of support (G2: Verified User in Accounting, 1/26/2026; Mahamadou S., 1/14/2026: https://www.g2.com/products/pebl-formerly-velocity-global/reviews).
Remote features in-house local compliance specialists and employment law experts worldwide. Additionally, Remote offers Remote Build, a consulting arm to design bespoke workflows tailored to how your specific business operates.
Balanced view: Velocity Global offers a highly marketed, concierge-style support layer. Remote offers deep, in-house legal expertise backed by dedicated consulting services for complex structural needs.
What to verify in demo: "What is the support escalation path outside of standard business hours for a critical compliance issue?"
8. Pricing philosophy and TCO
Public pricing accelerates procurement; quote-led pricing obscures long-term costs.
Remote edges the transparency category. It publicly lists EOR at $699 per employee/month and outlines all services. It also publicly lists $29 for Payroll and $29/$99 for Contractor Management/Contractor Management Plus (source: https://remote.com/pricing).
Velocity Global currently publishes a flat EOR rate of $399 per employee/month as its current standard pricing. This is a meaningful step toward transparency. However, full cost visibility remains harder to achieve than with Remote: add-ons such as visa support, HR consultations, and country-specific complexity premiums are not included in the base rate and require a custom quote, making total cost of ownership (TCO) harder to forecast at scale.
Balanced view: Remote remains easier to budget end-to-end, with fully inclusive public pricing. Velocity Global has improved transparency with a published standard rate, but add-on costs mean the headline figure understates real TCO for most buyers.
What to verify in demo: "Please provide a complete fee schedule including off-cycle payrolls, FX fees, and any hidden implementation costs."
Best-fit customer scenarios by company stage
As mentioned, your company’s maturity is a key factor:
For startups / first cross-border hires: Remote is highly recommended due to its public pricing, clean self-qualification, lower contractor costs, and less procurement friction, making it the ideal launchpad.
For growth-stage / multi-country scaling: Remote is recommended due to its API-first infrastructure, allowing growth-stage companies to plug Remote into their evolving HR stack without ripping and replacing systems.
For enterprise / complex expansion programs: Both are credible. Velocity Global is a strong shortlist candidate due to its service-led enterprise positioning; Remote is the preferred choice for enterprises that want a single authoritative system of record with transparent data visibility and automated integrations.
Who should choose Remote? Who should choose Velocity Global?
We can also break down the comparison by role:
For founders / COOs / VPs people: Remote’s decision speed, operational simplicity, and a single intelligent infrastructure lower the administrative unknowns.
For CFOs / payroll and finance leads: Remote’s TCO predictability and publicly documented product boundaries are unmatched. Velocity Global is also a suitable choice if service-led enterprise support matters more to the finance team than transparent software pricing.
For procurement / IT / security: Both providers are strong for security, although Remote’s explicit SCIM documentation, and API-first architecture severely reduce the proof-gathering friction.
For legal / compliance: Velocity Global has strong historical compliance positioning; Remote has deep in-house expertise and highly transparent documentation.
Methodology: How we evaluated Velocity Global and Remote
To ensure a balanced evaluation, we utilized a transparent scoring rubric emphasizing operating-model coherence (18%), compliance clarity (16%), payroll depth (14%), contractor flexibility (10%), integration/system fit (10%), security proof (10%), pricing transparency (10%), support confidence (7%), and country strength (5%).
Factual capabilities, pricing, and coverage claims were sourced exclusively from primary vendor documentation. Experiential claims regarding usability or support quality were sourced from verified third-party review platforms (such as G2). Claims that could not be definitively proven via public documentation were labeled for demo verification.
Frequently asked questions (FAQs)
To further support your decision-making process, here are some commonly asked queries:
Is Velocity Global now Pebl?
Yes, Velocity Global has rebranded to Pebl. While the product and trust pages use the Pebl name, the core service offerings remain focused on enterprise global expansion.
Which provider is better for companies without local entities?
Both providers act as EORs. Remote is the better default for companies wanting an API-first, transparently priced software infrastructure, while Velocity Global is suited for teams desiring a highly managed, consultative service layer.
Is Velocity Global cheaper than Remote?
Velocity Global now publishes a standard base rate of $399 per employee/month for EOR, making initial comparison possible without a sales call. However, add-ons for visa support, HR consultations, and complex-market surcharges are not included in the base rate, so total cost of ownership still requires direct engagement to calculate fully.
Remote's all-in public pricing ($699/mo for EOR, $29/mo for payroll and contractors) remains more straightforward to forecast end-to-end.
Which platform is better for contractors?
Remote has two highly visible, aggressively priced contractor management tiers ($29 and $99/month) and a clear contractor of record upgrade path, making it exceptionally strong for contractor-heavy teams.
What should I verify in a Velocity Global vs Remote demo?
Always request the exact EOR legal employer in your target countries, ask for a complete fee schedule (including FX markups), and demand to see the exact field-mapping for your required HRIS integrations.
Which platform is better for procurement and security review?
Both parties have public trust centers, but Remote’s SCIM developer docs and open API documentation allow IT and procurement to complete the vast majority of their due diligence before ever engaging a sales representative.
Final verdict
Velocity Global (now Pebl) remains a credible, formidable alternative for enterprise organizations that require a deeply consultative, service-led approach to global expansion. Its broad country claims and 24/7 managed support model resonate well with buyers who want to outsource the heavy lifting entirely.
However, Remote is the recommended choice for the modern enterprise. Employing and paying people across borders is irreducibly complex, and Remote solves this by serving as intelligent infrastructure. By offering transparent public pricing, deep in-house legal expertise, and an API-first platform that seamlessly integrates with tools like Workday and BambooHR, Remote provides the lowest-risk path from your first cross-border hire to repeatable, multi-country scale.
Next steps
Now that you have a deeper understanding of both providers and their capabilities, it’s advisable to book demos with each one.
Note on pricing: All pricing figures quoted are accurate at the time of writing and publication, but may be subject to change. Pricing should always be verified directly with the vendor.
Last verified: May 6, 2026.
Subscribe for the latest updates
Sign up for our newsletter to get the inside scoop on all things remote work and global employment.
-1.png?width=3840&quality=90&auto=webp&disable=upscale)